JUN29
The Plaintiffs’ Perspective on the ObamaCare Ruling
SHARE
Followed by
ANALYSIS OF WHAT THE RULING MEANS
Twenty-six states and the National Federation of Independent Business took an
unprecedented step in challenging the constitutionality of major provisions of the
President’s health care law. The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the landmark
case this week. Find out what the plaintiffs think of the decision by hearing reactions
from Texas Attorney General Gregg Abbott and Karen Harned, NFIB. They will
share their perspectives on the ruling, how the decision might impact the welfare
of states like Texas and small businesses, and what steps they are considering
in light of the decision. In addition, unpacking the implications of the Court’s
decision for health care, religious liberty, and limited government will be
Heritage scholars, complemented by the insights of former U.S. Attorney
General Edwin Meese.
unprecedented step in challenging the constitutionality of major provisions of the
President’s health care law. The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the landmark
case this week. Find out what the plaintiffs think of the decision by hearing reactions
from Texas Attorney General Gregg Abbott and Karen Harned, NFIB. They will
share their perspectives on the ruling, how the decision might impact the welfare
of states like Texas and small businesses, and what steps they are considering
in light of the decision. In addition, unpacking the implications of the Court’s
decision for health care, religious liberty, and limited government will be
Heritage scholars, complemented by the insights of former U.S. Attorney
General Edwin Meese.
